Need help with clarification

[windfire]

Can someone write this properly for me? I have trouble verbalizing it.PerspectiveObjectLogics.bas (1.92 KB)

[B+]


[LogicOpa]
print "NOTE:: UNFILTERED THOUGHTS ???"
print "Perspective is >> Perspective$([,],Pi2,Wt,Sp,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)== Op${?}<<([,],Pi2,Wt,Sp,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)"
print "The Object of the Perspective is in the execution or Object$ is ";"Object$_Op is >> Object== Op{?} is {[ ] 6.28318531 3.6853558 2 1 0.58654259 7.3707116 7.3707116 Output is True & function Op$}"
QuestionedLogic$="Output is True & function Op$ is Logic$_[LogicOpa] &  <vs> Logic$_[LogicOpa] is function Op$"
Pi2=2*(atn(1)*4)
Wt=3.6853558
Sp=2
tim=1
InSumation$="& function Op$ is Logic$_[LogicOpa] &  <vs> Logic$_[LogicOpa] is function Op$ & Confermed QuestionedLogic$"
  nop$=Op$("[","]",Pi2,Wt,Sp,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)
  'print Op$;"   ";Confermation$;" ";InSumation$
  print Confermation$;" ";InSumation$
  ObjectTruthKnobj$=unkOp$("[","]",Pi2,Wt,Sp,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)
  print "ObjectTruthKnobj$ ";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$
  print "Questioned >> ";QuestionedLogic$;" & Confermed QuestionedLogic$"
  print "Op$= ";Op$;"    ";"is confermed"
   print
  end
'VariableName$^^Output Logic_Key:Logic_Address
 function Op$(byref nop1$,byref nop2$,byref Pi2,byref Wt,byref Sp,byref tim,byref L,byref Pt,byref Op$,byref Confermation$,byref KnObject$)
   Opa=(Wt*Sp)
   correct$=str$(1/Opa)
   L=Wt/Pi2
   Opb=((L*Pi2)*Sp)
   Pt=(L*Sp*Pi2)*tim
   Opc=(Pt/tim)
   Ans=(Opa/Opb/Opc)
   if str$(Ans)=correct$ then
   Op$=str$(Opa):Confermation$="Output is True"
   end if
 end function
'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 function unkOp$(byref unk1$,byref unk2$,byref unk3,byref unk4,byref unk5,byref unk6,byref unk7,byref unk8,byref unk9$,byref unk10$,byref unk11$)
    unkOp$=" ";unk1$;" ";unk2$;" ";unk3;" ";unk4;" ";unk5;" ";unk6;" ";unk7;" ";unk8;" ";unk9$;" ";unk10$;" ";unk11$
       KnObject$=unkOp$
 end function



Perhaps it may explain itself if variables were more descriptive?

To start with, the function unkOp$ seems to be merely stringing together strings and numbers with spaces in between.

Why are you cluttering up that function definition with all those byref's? You aren't changing any of their values
Never mind you arent even using it!!!

Oops yes you are using unkOp$, JB search function sucks, or it's operator ;-))

[B+]

 function unkOp$(byref unk1$,byref unk2$,byref unk3,byref unk4,byref unk5,byref unk6,byref unk7,byref unk8,byref unk9$,byref unk10$,byref unk11$)
    unkOp$=" ";unk1$;" ";unk2$;" ";unk3;" ";unk4;" ";unk5;" ";unk6;" ";unk7;" ";unk8;" ";unk9$;" ";unk10$;" ";unk11$
       KnObject$=unkOp$ ' <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ???
 end function


Why set KnObject$ ? Unless you make it global it's not seen anywhere else in program.

[windfire]

The object is to make the updater {later} in association with the perspective object.
example
if stat(1)=1 then unk1$=Wt/(2*Pi)
thus logic in can be L {inductive reactance} while output logic is P {pulse}
Why ??
L as pulse in logic>> XL=((L*frq)*pi2) associates with logic>> Op=((pulse*Speed*Pi2))
Thus on the logic of Speed in feet\sec associated with Speed 1ft at 1 =1ft_lb converted to joules {*1.356} ==Frq in joules
leading to associations of logics.
Frequency and Speed associate to changes per second.
any way It is used as a transfer of updated associative logic.

Ps,
 a circle of rdi>4 and dia =rdi*2  is a different structure_object than of rdi>6 and dia =4*2 :note the logic difference.

[B+]

Are all your variables supposed to be real numbers or are Booleans involved (True False, 0 or 1)?

I ask because when you speak of Logic it is usually the case that only Booleans are involved.

I repeat my comment above:

Perhaps it may explain itself if variables were more descriptive?

Perhaps explain each variable as you set it with a comment.

This is overall about electricity and possibly logic gates?

[windfire]

No The logics are key code related by association.
If k_a associated to key_b then K_f is true.Note K_f is an address.
 K_a$="We went to the store is true"
 K_b$="They went to the store is true"
K_f$="Someone went to the store"
if a and b are true the f is true. goto [f]
[f]
print "He means someone went to the store."
return
But if K_b= "The team went to the store ."
then
K_g$ of perspective is goto [G]
[g]
print "He means a team went to the store."
return

[B+]

Ha! What just happened? I saw all this stuff and then disappeared?

I also saw windfire say he figured out something ;-))

[windfire]

My thought is
Something new in an attempt to deal with variable compound associations.
sorry got off track {nervious}

[B+]

Ah now your edit is making some sense.

What you call keys we called propositions (if I recall my days with Logic 101 correctly).

[B+]

I just looked up associative logic. interesting

www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2017/07/12/one-key-secret-to-innovation-associative-logic/?sh=1e7834b440a0

[windfire]

I have a way of getting an string or strings into a unique tag then an associative Key.
thus the key is the logic of tag. now i can manipulate associations.
As you can see i have trouble communicating.
a test sheet of:

a==true
b=true
c=true
  page key ==k_n  ==pass 100%

a=true
b=faulse
c=true
page key =k_k == near passs 30%

Perspective is reffrance correct sheet
while the objects are the test sheets

[windfire]

B+ Thanks for your replies.
Hope I haven't confused you. I need to clear my programing . I'll work on your suggestions .

[B+]

JB doesn't have User Defined Types AKA Structures AKA ?

But you can use multiple arrays (always global in JB) with a common index and that index number would be key to proposition$() array and TFvalue() array (0's and 1's or number on range from 0 to 1 like a probability) thusly you can fairly easily do logical analysis from such in JB, just a suggestion.

K$(1)="We went to the store." : TF(1) = 1
K$(2)="They went to the store." : TF(2) = 1
K$(3)="Someone went to the store." : TF(3) = TF(1) Or TF(2)

extending:
K$(4) = "I went to the store" : TF(4) = TF(3) and NOT TF(2) ?

Be right back!

K$(1)="We went to the store." : TF(1) = 0
K$(2)="They went to the store." : TF(2) = 0
K$(3)="Someone went to the store." : TF(3) = TF(1) Or TF(2)

'extending:
K$(4) = "I went to the store." : TF(4) = (TF(3) and NOT(TF(2))) or (TF(3) and TF(1))
if TF(4) then print K$(4) else print "NOT " + K$(4)


Therefore the difference between they and we is me. Oh but maybe you too

Update: I guess this is better because simpler
K$(4) = "I went to the store." : TF(4) = (TF(3) and NOT(TF(2))) or TF(1)

[windfire]

B+,
I see my code is all wrong.
Critical error!! Posted before checking the code. Was concerned about the explanation and rushed.
Would appreciate you looking again after I repost it later.

[windfire]

Note Variables are more or less abbreviated .
AssociativeLogics.bas (6.17 KB)


' Question is>> if the {Sp/Frq;Wt} hypotenuse reaction is synonymic then is the_

' Logic that both are the same properties_Output with different logic_properties.

' ie: distance as Ft/s or J/s ;conversion

'

' The idea is to track and associate the properties and logics of both_

' and build {say;; a clue or thought list of observations and decide if they have_

' a common perspective_logic association and how much or to what extent.

' ie if repeated several times and confermation is persistant then Yes=page of observations define it so.

' My question is would this make a learning tool {rutine} for {many} logic_associations of objects and persptv's?





gosub [LogicOpa2]   'Dealing with perspective as a tank circuit logic_refferance to logic charting

gosub [LogicOpa]    'Dealing with perspective as a falling object logic_refferance to logic charting

end                 'Overall associating one perspective.logic properties to another .

                    'NOTE: an object is all or part of the perspective ie: chart up to Op is object of chart of Pt perspective.



[LogicOpa]

print

print "NOTE::"

print "The Object of the Perspective is in the execution or Object$ is ";"Object$_Op is >> Object== Op{?} is {";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$;"]"        '[ ] 6.28318531 3.6853558 2 1 0.58654259 7.3707116 7.3707116 Output is True & function Op$}"

print:print

Logic$="logic of Falling Op's"

print "NOTE:: UNFILTERED THOUGHTS ???"

print Logic$;" associated to Perspective and Object's"

print "Perspective is >> Perspective$([,],Pi2,Wt,Frq,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)== Op${?}<<([,],Pi2,Wt,Sp,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)"

' print "The Object of the Perspective is in the execution or Object$ is ";"Object$_Op is >> Object== Op{?} is {";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$;"]"        '[ ] 6.28318531 3.6853558 2 1 0.58654259 7.3707116 7.3707116 Output is True & function Op$}"

QuestionedLogic$="Output is True & function Op$ is Logic$_[LogicOpa] &  <vs> Logic$_[LogicOpa] is function Op$"

Pi2=2*(atn(1)*4)

Wt=3.6853558

Sp=4

associateSp=Sp

Frq=associateSp

tim=1

InSumation$="& function Op$ is Logic$_[LogicOpa] &  <vs> Logic$_[LogicOpa] is function Op$ & Confermed QuestionedLogic$"

  nop$=Op$("[","]",Pi2,Wt,Frq,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)

  'print Op$;"   ";Confermation$;" ";InSumation$

  print Confermation$;" ";InSumation$

  ObjectTruthKnobj$=unkOp$("[","]",Pi2,Wt,Frq,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)

  print "ObjectTruthKnobj$ ";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$

  print "Questioned >> ";QuestionedLogic$;" & Confermed QuestionedLogic$"

  print "Op$= ";Op$;"    ";"is confermed"

  if AssociateOp*(1/MFt.J)=val(Op$) then print "@@@@@@@@@@@@ Fire"

  Association$="Op and XL or semantic_objects of Output logics as defined by chart_structural logic"

  Tosay$="{to say}> the hypotonus of Frq/Sp & weight react semanticly as logic < Output$ >"

  print Association$

  print Tosay$

  print

  print "NOTE::"

  print "The Object of the Perspective is in the execution or Object$ is ";"Object$_Op is >> Object== Op{?} is {";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$;"]"        '[ ] 6.28318531 3.6853558 2 1 0.58654259 7.3707116 7.3707116 Output is True & function Op$}"

  print

  print

  print "first run|| Op$= Op and XL is confermed to be property synonymic"

  print "see note [0.000y]":gosub [0.000y]

  end

'VariableName$^^Output Logic_Key:Logic_Address

 function Op$(byref nop1$,byref nop2$,byref Pi2,byref Wt,byref Frq,byref tim,byref L,byref Pt,byref Op$,byref Confermation$,byref KnObject$)

   Opa=(Wt*Frq)

   correct$=str$(1/Opa)

   L=Wt/Pi2

   Opb=((L*Pi2)*Frq)

   Pt=(L*Frq*Pi2)*tim

   Opc=(Pt/tim)

   Ans=(Opa/Opb/Opc)

   if str$(Ans)=correct$ then

   Op$=str$(Opa):Confermation$="Output is True"

   end if

 end function

'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 function unkOp$(byref unk1$,byref unk2$,byref unk3,byref unk4,byref unk5,byref unk6,byref unk7,byref unk8,byref unk9$,byref unk10$,byref unk11$)

    unkOp$=" ";unk1$;" ";unk2$;" ";unk3;" ";unk4;" ";unk5;" ";unk6;" ";unk7;" ";unk8;" ";unk9$;" ";unk10$;" ";unk11$

       KnObject$=unkOp$

 end function

'@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

'@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

[LogicOpa2]

Logic$="logic of TankCircuit XL$ as Op's"

print "NOTE:: UNFILTERED THOUGHTS ???"

print Logic$;" associated to Perspective and Object's"

print "Perspective is >> Perspective$([,],Pi2,Wt,Sp,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)== Op${?}<<([,],Pi2,Wt,Frq,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)"

'print "The Object of the Perspective is in the execution or Object$ is ";"Object$_Op is >> Object== Op{?} is {";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$;"]"        '[ ] 6.28318531 3.6853558 2 1 0.58654259 7.3707116 7.3707116 Output is True & function Op$}"

QuestionedLogic$="Output is True & function Op$ is Logic$_[LogicOpa] &  <vs> Logic$_[LogicOpa] is function Op$"

MFt.J=1.3558179483

Sp=4

Frq=(Sp*MFt.J)

Pi2=2*(atn(1)*4)

Wt=3.6853558

Frq=Frq*MFt.J

tim=1

InSumation$="& function Op$ is Logic$_[LogicOpa] &  <vs> Logic$_[LogicOpa] is function Op$ & Confermed QuestionedLogic$"

  nop$=Op$("[","]",Pi2,Wt,Frq,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)

  'print Op$;"   ";Confermation$;" ";InSumation$

  print Confermation$;" ";InSumation$

  ObjectTruthKnobj$=unkOp$("[","]",Pi2,Wt,Frq,tim,L,Pt,Op$,Confermation$,KnObject$)

  print "ObjectTruthKnobj$ ";ObjectTruthKnobj$;InSumation$

  print "Questioned >> ";QuestionedLogic$;" & Confermed QuestionedLogic$"

  print "Op$= ";Op$;"    ";"is confermed"

  AssociateOp=val(Op$)

  print "AssociateOp=val(Op$)"

  return

[0.000y]

print

print tab(26);" [0.000y]"

print tab(26);" All templite formula's are the same. ?? t/f entent"

print tab(26);" Logic postion's are the same if no conversion. ?? t/f entent"

print tab(26);" Logic unit's same{consistant} with conversion but properties remain. ?? t/f entent"

print tab(26);" ect"

print tab(26);" ect"

print tab(26);" conclution confermed and 98% probibale ther is a common association."

return